General Discussions

Nathan Fillion starring in sequel........................but not Serenity's sequel......Booooooo!!

POSTED BY: impindahizzy
UPDATED: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:41
VIEWED: 8448
PAGE 2 of 3

Tuesday, February 14, 2006 6:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MalsGirl:
Happy! Happy! Good to hear Nathan's getting more work. But wait, he's playing Michael Keaton's character? Didn't he die at the end of the first movie?



indeed he did.

what the article does not tell you is that our dear captain does not have a speaking role, as he will merely be playing a corpse.

he does make a great deal of screen time, however, and will undoubtedly stun us all with his brilliant portrayal of grief, with a small dose of silent contemplation, and a few well timed bits of wittily sarcastic emoting, all while lolling about in a coffin that the other main character feels compelled to bring with him throughout his life (it's a compulsion thing, i don't think they explain it very well in the movie, but it will be revealed rather well in the commentaries following general confusion and speculation among fans.)

let's just hope there aren't too many maggots.






actually, i have no idea.

i'm just bored out of my mind in class, and hungry for lunch.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, February 14, 2006 6:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nevered:


indeed he did.

what the article does not tell you is that our dear captain does not have a speaking role, as he will merely be playing a corpse.

he does make a great deal of screen time, however, and will undoubtedly stun us all with his brilliant portrayal of grief, with a small dose of silent contemplation, and a few well timed bits of wittily sarcastic emoting, all while lolling about in a coffin that the other main character feels compelled to bring with him throughout his life (it's a compulsion thing, i don't think they explain it very well in the movie, but it will be revealed rather well in the commentaries following general confusion and speculation among fans.)

let's just hope there aren't too many maggots.






actually, i have no idea.

i'm just bored out of my mind in class, and hungry for lunch.



I believed you. I actually believed you until the end *facepalm*. God, I'm such a gullible dork.

"Pain is scary." -Jayne
Mal=Hotness on an unknown level

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SerenityForever:
I have White Noise on DVD. I wouldn't call it terrible, by any stretch, and I'm a fairly harsh critic. I thought it was pretty good, actually. Not great. Not fantastic. But entertaining, and certainly worth at least a rent.



If it comes to HBO, I'll watch it, but I'm not going to pay to see it. I rarely rent movies/go to the movies as it is.

I'm just tired of Hollywood's over-the-top theatrics with movies like this. The new Amityville Horror? Big disappointment. Although, I look at that in a different perspective since I know a bit about it. I was expecting it to be based on Jay Anson's novel (since the cast and crew argued that it was), and having read that there was just so much that the writer(s) added to it that it was almost a completely different story. Can you tell I'm bitter? ;)

-Meg

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:36 PM

Quote:

The new Amityville Horror? Big disappointment. Although, I look at that in a different perspective since I know a bit about it. I was expecting it to be based on Jay Anson's novel (since the cast and crew argued that it was), and having read that there was just so much that the writer(s) added to it that it was almost a completely different story. Can you tell I'm bitter? ;)

-Meg



You're upset about it being different than Jay Anson's book? I grew up in Amityville, NY. (yes, seriously) The creative license that *he* took with the "real" story frustrated me, and Warner Brothers got sued because of the original movie and the problems that it caused =p In the end, I had to just write it off as a horror book and try to just enjoy it as entertainment, or I would've ended up with too much stress =)

Amiton
(whose name is derived from Amityville...try to find the "what does your name mean?" thread in the archives)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:51 PM

I'm not saying Anson's book is legit. It's just that it's a good story that had/has potential to be a good movie.

I enjoyed the 70s movie more than the new one, bad film and all. Literally, it was a bad copy. I don't know if all of them are like that since it's older. But I'm just bitter that everyone on set insisted that it was an adaptation from Anson's novel, and it clearly isn't. I mean, the house alone is ugly. Purists everywhere cried foul on that one.

Since you're from Amityville, what's your take on the whole "incident?" Just curious. I'm fascinated by this stuff, but I can't help but think "Hoax!" every time it's mentioned.

-Meg

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:52 PM

I'm totally not understanding how some of y'all can
say you won't go see it. How can you not support
this guy? Remember he's got this like, really big
part in Firefly? I think it would be a sign of good
faith to say the least if we could at least go see
his other movies. Unless y'all just want him to,
you know, ride off into the sunset before he even
turns 40.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by longlostbristow:
Since you're from Amityville, what's your take on the whole "incident?" Just curious. I'm fascinated by this stuff, but I can't help but think "Hoax!" every time it's mentioned.



I think it's total crap. I love the concept of paranormalism and spooky demon stuff as much as anyone, but I've been in the house. I've played in the "Red Room." The guy who killed his family there, whose name suddenly picked *now* to escape me, did just that. He changed his story in the last five or so years from "the devil made me to it" to "my sister killed everyone, and then I killed her when I came home" by the way. The DeFeo's, I don't have much faith in.

For the record, I do enjoy the movie and the book (I haven't seen the new one, btw), but for me, they're just interesting fiction set in a really familiar neighborhood =p As far as the divergence between the book and the movie, it didn't really seem any more out of place than most movie adaptations. =)

Amiton.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:02 PM

Also look for him in the Movie "Slither" March 31. But its only in limited relase..its a Science Fiction/Fantasy and Suspense/Horror.

"lets go to work"

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by oldfogey:
I'm totally not understanding how some of y'all can
say you won't go see it. How can you not support
this guy? Remember he's got this like, really big
part in Firefly? I think it would be a sign of good
faith to say the least if we could at least go see
his other movies. Unless y'all just want him to,
you know, ride off into the sunset before he even
turns 40.



I'm not going to see Slither. Does that make me a bad person? No. I'm not going to pay to see a movie that doesn't appeal to me. I don't even get out to see most of the movies that DO appeal to me.

Quote:

Originally posted by Amiton:
I've played in the "Red Room." The guy who killed his family there, whose name suddenly picked *now* to escape me, did just that. He changed his story in the last five or so years from "the devil made me to it" to "my sister killed everyone, and then I killed her when I came home" by the way.



In the "red room?!" ;) Isn't it just like a whole in the wall, or a closet? That's what I've heard. And I didn't know about DeFeo changing his story so many times. Interesting.

And about the movie adaptations. Yes, that's true. I shouldn't have expected anything different really. The only movies from books that I like are the Harry Potters...and they're missing a great deal from what's in the book. Not much added, though.

-Meg

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by longlostbristow:
Quote:

Originally posted by oldfogey:
I'm totally not understanding how some of y'all can
say you won't go see it. How can you not support
this guy? Remember he's got this like, really big
part in Firefly? I think it would be a sign of good
faith to say the least if we could at least go see
his other movies. Unless y'all just want him to,
you know, ride off into the sunset before he even
turns 40.



I'm not going to see Slither. Does that make me a bad person? No. I'm not going to pay to see a movie that doesn't appeal to me. I don't even get out to see most of the movies that DO appeal to me.

And about the movie adaptations. Yes, that's true. I shouldn't have expected anything different really. The only movies from books that I like are the Harry Potters...and they're missing a great deal from what's in the book. Not much added, though.

-Meg



I'd have to agree, I usually go see movies that interest me, and I don't normally care who the actors are. I'm watching it to be entertained by the story, not to see it because I liked a different character that a particular actor did in the past.

And going on with the movies from books thing...the books are usually way better, with the exception of the LOTR movies.

Don't even get me started on the evils of the Harry Potter movies....I've found it better to pretend that they don't exist, especially the third one

Wash: Yeah, but psychic? That sounds like science fiction.
Zoe: You live on a spaceship, dear.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME