Other Science Fiction Series

It's clobberin' time!

POSTED BY: chrisisall
UPDATED: Monday, December 12, 2005 02:55
VIEWED: 3264
PAGE 3 of 3

Wednesday, December 7, 2005 6:29 PM


I bought it, I saw it, and I enjoyed the HELL out of it!
Flawed? Yes. But fun! Definitly worth my $15.
(Here's the part where people can yell at me...)
It might not be a better film than X2, but I enjoyed it a whole lot more!

*turns invisible and puts up the force field*

Clobberin' timeisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, December 7, 2005 8:41 PM

I really liked it. But then, I was completely unfamiliar with the comic and I adore Chris Evans. So that probably upped my enjoyment level.

"Well, then, I believe perhaps that I am, in fact, completely screwed."

Like books? Go to this thread: http://www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=2&t=14862
to find out how to buy mine!

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, December 9, 2005 12:52 AM

I liked the way their powers reflected their lives; Sue felt that Reed couldn't 'see' her, Reed was always 'stretching' things to see the positive outcome for humanity, Ben wasn't loved by Deb for his true self, and his change forced him to find his real love, Johnny was a hothead, always pushing the envelope (playing with fire, as it were), and Victor had a heart cold as steele.
And boy was it just plain funny at times!

Fantastic Four was one of the better comic adaptions, IMHO!

FLAME-ONisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, December 9, 2005 2:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cybersnark:
The Ben/Johnny feud was comedy gold

It's been a while since I laughed out loud like that at a movie!
Well... actually NOT that long, I lol'd in Serenity now that I think on it.
But, a more fun film- I cant remember...
Maybe Jackie Chan's Medallion, but even that wasn't AS fun as Fantastic Four.

Chrisisall clobbered

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, December 9, 2005 3:49 PM

That's it! Galaxy Quest was the last time I lol'd that hard!
GQ is probably THE most FUN movie ever!

Chrisisall, by Grabthar's Hammer

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, December 9, 2005 3:54 PM

It was Grabthar's Hammer.

Yes, I can quote Galaxy Quest on command.

-----
We applied the cortical electrodes but were unable to get a neural reaction from either patient.

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, December 9, 2005 3:59 PM

What do you mean? That's what I wrote...

Sorry, it's been months since I watched my copy...

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, December 12, 2005 2:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
This movie needed to have the PG-13 rating dropped to a PG and a more sinister bad guy. It might have made a good children’s flick.


Finn, how was it not a good children's flick? With just a few touches of the fast-foward, I think my six year old son would really love it!

And where was the '13' necessary after the PG? The Empire Strikes Back had sterner stuff in it IMO.

Chrisisall, 13 at heart

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, December 12, 2005 2:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Finn, how was it not a good children's flick? With just a few touches of the fast-foward, I think my six year old son would really love it!

Exactly, I think you’ve answered your own question, not to put too fine a point on it. I think it would have been a movie that would have really connected with a younger audience, had they tweaked it a little bit to get rid of some of the adult content. Not that there was a lot of adult content, but what there was did not serve to make the film better, it just confined its audience. I can't think of any examples right now. It's been a while since I've seen it, but that was my impression at the time, so I'm sure there was something in the movie that made me think that.

I think they’re making the same mistake with the Harry Potter movies. The last one I saw was so visually frightening it was like a horror film.
Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
And where was the '13' necessary after the PG? The Empire Strikes Back had sterner stuff in it IMO.

The Empire Strikes should have been PG-13. It wasn’t because that rating didn’t exist at the time, but I can remember the effect that movie had on me, and I was 12 or 13 when I saw it. It was really a very dark movie for a child.

-------------
Qui desiderat pacem praeparet bellum.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, December 12, 2005 2:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Finn mac Cumhal:
I can remember the effect [The Empire Strikes Back] had on me, and I was 12 or 13 when I saw it. It was really a very dark movie for a child.


I cried when Han was tortured, and when Vader forced Luke to jump, possibly to his death- yeah it was rough (Damn, and I was, like, 20!!!!!!!!)

Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME