Anecdotal evidence of psychic abilities; any 'readers' out there?
POSTED BY: chrisisall
UPDATED: Thursday, September 22, 2005 21:54
VIEWED: 4733
PAGE 5 of 5
Quote:
Originally posted by CUnknown:
I wasn't attacking anyone. I certainly won't let you bully me into silence by using charged phrases like "emotional violence." Try again.
So telling people they're lying about they're experiences based on nothing more than it hasn't happened to you and one incident where someone has lied is what, exactly?
Zen Buddhist to the Hotdog Vendor:
"Make me one with everything."
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
CUknown,
"The odds that the various psychic claims of people on this board (and elsewhere) are real should seem small to any rational, dispassionate person. The odds that the claims are real, -and- that they will point to a flaw in some well-established scientific theory are so remote as to be not worth discussion."
So, could you allow the irrational and passionate persons on this board to share their anecdotes as there is nothing to discuss?
def: anecdote- a short interesting or humorous account of a real or fictitious incident.
There's nothing here that's really threatening to reason, democracy, freedom or the ideals of the Enlightenment. You could just interpret it as story-telling and let it go at that.
milagro
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
CUNKNOWN:
"The odds that the various psychic claims of people on this board (and elsewhere) are real should seem small to any rational, dispassionate person. The odds that the claims are real, -and- that they will point to a flaw in some well-established scientific theory are so remote as to be not worth discussion."
and "Something of an over-reaction, huh?" NO. It was a great underreaction.
Get you head out of your ass, dolt, look stuff up, and do me a favor and go away while you do so. You are not rational. Your "opinions" are nothing more than embarrassing admissions of your own limitations. They add zero to the discussions and only serve to waste the time of those willing to share and learn from this thread.
You FAILED to respond to my remark on remote viewing, so go here:
http://www.biomindsuperpowers.com/Pages/CIA-InitiatedRV.html
or here:
http://www.militaryremoteviewers.com/cia_remote_viewing_sri.htm [same material]
or here: http://www.crystalinks.com/remote_viewing.html [techniques, with more links]
Look into things before you come here with your pants down and embarrass us all again. Find out the vastness of your shameful limitations.
[extract]
"In July 1995 the CIA declassified, and approved for release, documents revealing its sponsorship in the 1970s of a program at Stanford Research Institute in Menlo Park, CA, to determine whether such phenomena as remote viewing "might have any utility for intelligence collection" [1]. Thus began disclosure to the public of a two-decade-plus involvement of the intelligence community in the investigation of so-called parapsychological or psi phenomena. Presented here by the program's Founder and first Director (1972 - 1985) is the early history of the program, including discussion of some of the first, now declassified, results that drove early interest."
"...the integrated results appear to provide unequivocal evidence of a human capacity to access events remote in space and time, however falteringly, by some cognitive process not yet understood."
CUNKNOWN, do you really think the CIA and DOD would have looked so seriously into this if there were nothing in it? Are you unaware that most pets are able to know when their owners are coming or going, or thinking about them? Can you be so totally blind, not to mention ignorant?
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Cavalier,
Thank you ever so much, amigo, for your kind words. I hope to be able to add to my post at a later date, but it might well be a long time later. Business matters press.
All best,
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
At the top of the thread I said I was a lowly footsoldier in China circa 1800, that wasn't entirely accurate. In the way that you can never grasp the same handful of water from a stream twice, so do I feel that our souls intertwine and mix with the bodies we inhabit in our lives here. Some part of the energy that goes through me now had, at one time, been connected to (in large part, or small) the energy that was the lowly footsoldier I describe. I've had all manner of dreams- even many where I'm aware in the dream that I'm dreaming to the extent that I can control (direct) the dream, and this one was different than any I'd ever had before or since. It was not drug-induced and was not due to sickness or exaustion. It had the taste, the smell and the damp coldness of reality to it, stronger than a memory, yet just enough removed to not be immediate real-life.
Like a momentary flash-reliving of a few seconds of me- before me.
I've also had two instances of what might be some kind of projection; asleep, then dreaming/seeing myself on the bed, with nothing else happening.
I dream all sorts of fancy- actiony stuff, not quietly looking down at myself, that's not in any way the pattern. There's always movement, sound, or flight (like when I'm Superman). This was very quiet and still, a way that I can't even get when I (try) to meditate.
That's my 'psychic' story, from a very real-life/hard facts based western mind (IMO).
Chrisisallgoingontoolong
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME