Wow... How America's Accurate Election Polls Were Covered Up

POSTED BY: 6ixStringJack
UPDATED: Friday, August 1, 2025 03:52
VIEWED: 280
PAGE 1 of 1

6IXSTRINGJACK

Sunday, July 27, 2025 2:48 PM

The Real Clear Politics National Average was removed by Wikipedia before the election and the New York Times denounced its failure to skew data. A solution to the "mystery" of crappy polling?

https://www.racket.news/p/how-americas-accurate-election-polls

I wasn't aware of any of this.

They hid RCP for not hiding polls that the other (now-defunct) aggregate websites were hiding.

I knew the other sites were hiding the accurate polls, because they've been doing that for at least 3 Presidential Election Cycles now and I've been watching them do it with my own eyes.

But I didn't realize that they were actively going to these measures to cover up any bad polling for Democrats to hide from the normies. They completely removed RCP from Wikipedia for 3 full weeks before the election???

We need more reporting like this story.

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Thursday, July 31, 2025 2:08 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
The Real Clear Politics National Average was removed by Wikipedia before the election and the New York Times denounced its failure to skew data. A solution to the "mystery" of crappy polling?

https://www.racket.news/p/how-americas-accurate-election-polls

I wasn't aware of any of this.

They hid RCP for not hiding polls that the other (now-defunct) aggregate websites were hiding.

I knew the other sites were hiding the accurate polls, because they've been doing that for at least 3 Presidential Election Cycles now and I've been watching them do it with my own eyes.

But I didn't realize that they were actively going to these measures to cover up any bad polling for Democrats to hide from the normies. They completely removed RCP from Wikipedia for 3 full weeks before the election???

We need more reporting like this story.

I know you avoid such facts, but Rush was covering this in the 1990s. And updating for each Election after that.
This is all SOP for Libtards. Welcome to the real world. You've been avoiding it long enough.

6IXSTRINGJACK

Friday, August 1, 2025 3:52 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
The Real Clear Politics National Average was removed by Wikipedia before the election and the New York Times denounced its failure to skew data. A solution to the "mystery" of crappy polling?

https://www.racket.news/p/how-americas-accurate-election-polls

I wasn't aware of any of this.

They hid RCP for not hiding polls that the other (now-defunct) aggregate websites were hiding.

I knew the other sites were hiding the accurate polls, because they've been doing that for at least 3 Presidential Election Cycles now and I've been watching them do it with my own eyes.

But I didn't realize that they were actively going to these measures to cover up any bad polling for Democrats to hide from the normies. They completely removed RCP from Wikipedia for 3 full weeks before the election???

We need more reporting like this story.
I know you avoid such facts, but Rush was covering this in the 1990s. And updating for each Election after that.
This is all SOP for Libtards. Welcome to the real world. You've been avoiding it long enough.

I predicted the election results more closely than anyone you know in real life, online or in the media.

Shut the fuck up.

And fuck Rush Limbaugh's dead corpse.

--------------------------------------------------

"I don't find this stuff amusing anymore." ~Paul Simon