Real World Event Discussions

Post-modern philosphy: Is this your basis?

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Wednesday, August 26, 2026 20:43
VIEWED: 2439
PAGE 1 of 1

Thursday, August 24, 2017 7:51 PM

I don't recall how I got there, but I stumbled on this little gem while bunny-trailing my way through a topic, and found it very interesting. I think that part of the disconnect that happens on the board is that some people treat everything as a matter of opinion, which is a feature of post-modern philosophy

Quote:

Postmodern philosophy is a philosophical direction which is critical of certain foundational assumptions of Western philosophy and especially of the 18th-century Enlightenment. It emphasizes the importance of power relationships, personalization and discourse in the "construction" of truth and world views. Postmodernists deny that an objective reality exists, and deny that there are objective moral values....


many postmodern claims are a deliberate repudiation of certain 18th-century Enlightenment values. A postmodernist might believe that there is no objective natural reality, and that logic and reason are mere conceptual constructs that are not universally valid. Two other characteristic anti-Enlightenment postmodern practices are a denial that human nature exists, and a (sometimes moderate) skepticism toward claims that science and technology will change society for the better. Postmodernists also believe there are no objective moral values. Postmodern writings often focus on deconstructing the role that power and ideology play in shaping discourse and belief. Postmodern philosophy shares ontological similarities with classical skeptical and relativistic belief systems, and shares political similarities with modern identity politics.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodern_philosophy

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, August 24, 2017 8:01 PM

They are absolutely part of the post-modern philosophy movement, with a dash of Marxism for good measure.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, August 24, 2017 8:56 PM

THIS is the reference I first stumbled on, it gives a much better description ....

Quote:

Postmodernism as a philosophical movement is largely a reaction against the philosophical assumptions and values of the modern period of Western (specifically European) history—i.e., the period from about the time of the scientific revolution of the 16th and 17th centuries to the mid-20th century. Indeed, many of the doctrines characteristically associated with postmodernism can fairly be described as the straightforward denial of general philosophical viewpoints that were taken for granted during the 18th-century Enlightenment, though they were not unique to that period. The most important of these viewpoints are the following.

1. There is an objective natural reality, a reality whose existence and properties are logically independent of human beings—of their minds, their societies, their social practices, or their investigative techniques. Postmodernists dismiss this idea as a kind of naive realism. Such reality as there is, according to postmodernists, is a conceptual construct, an artifact of scientific practice and language. This point also applies to the investigation of past events by historians and to the description of social institutions, structures, or practices by social scientists.

2. The descriptive and explanatory statements of scientists and historians can, in principle, be objectively true or false. The postmodern denial of this viewpoint—which follows from the rejection of an objective natural reality—is sometimes expressed by saying that there is no such thing as Truth.

3. Through the use of reason and logic, and with the more specialized tools provided by science and technology, human beings are likely to change themselves and their societies for the better. It is reasonable to expect that future societies will be more humane, more just, more enlightened, and more prosperous than they are now. Postmodernists deny this Enlightenment faith in science and technology as instruments of human progress. Indeed, many postmodernists hold that the misguided (or unguided) pursuit of scientific and technological knowledge led to the development of technologies for killing on a massive scale in World War II. Some go so far as to say that science and technology—and even reason and logic—are inherently destructive and oppressive, because they have been used by evil people, especially during the 20th century, to destroy and oppress others.

4. Reason and logic are universally valid—i.e., their laws are the same for, or apply equally to, any thinker and any domain of knowledge. For postmodernists, reason and logic too are merely conceptual constructs and are therefore valid only within the established intellectual traditions in which they are used.

5. There is such a thing as human nature; it consists of faculties, aptitudes, or dispositions that are in some sense present in human beings at birth rather than learned or instilled through social forces. Postmodernists insist that all, or nearly all, aspects of human psychology are completely socially determined.

6. Language refers to and represents a reality outside itself. According to postmodernists, language is not such a “mirror of nature,” as the American pragmatist philosopher Richard Rorty characterized the Enlightenment view. Inspired by the work of the Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure, postmodernists claim that language is semantically self-contained, or self-referential: the meaning of a word is not a static thing in the world or even an idea in the mind but rather a range of contrasts and differences with the meanings of other words. Because meanings are in this sense functions of other meanings—which themselves are functions of other meanings, and so on—they are never fully “present” to the speaker or hearer but are endlessly “deferred.” Self-reference characterizes not only natural languages but also the more specialized “discourses” of particular communities or traditions; such discourses are embedded in social practices and reflect the concep

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:56 PM

I think I fit somewhere between Enlightenment and Post-Modernism

Quote:

1. There is an objective natural reality, a reality whose existence and properties are logically independent of human beings—of their minds, their societies, their social practices, or their investigative techniques. Postmodernists dismiss this idea as a kind of naive realism. Such reality as there is, according to postmodernists, is a conceptual construct, an artifact of scientific practice and language.
I think if you want to deny the existence of an independent reality, you should test your theory by stepping in front of an 18-wheeler going 35 mph. Come back, and tell us how it went.
Quote:

This point also applies to the investigation of past events by historians and to the description of social institutions, structures, or practices by social scientists.
Just because societies are complex doesn't mean that they can't be understood better.

Quote:

2. The descriptive and explanatory statements of scientists and historians can, in principle, be objectively true or false. The postmodern denial of this viewpoint—which follows from the rejection of an objective natural reality — is sometimes expressed by saying that there is no such thing as Truth.
Just as an aside, I follow the philosophical understanding that truth is an accurate description of reality. There is often a disconnect here on the word "truth" or "true", which is often used to mean "honesty" or "honest".

The ACCURACY of one's understanding is the ability to RE-CREATE or at least PREDICT a certain outcome. Newton's understanding of gravity was tested by being able to predict planetary orbits; Einstein's understanding of gravity was tested by being able to predict the path of starlight as it traveled past the sun.

Quote:

3. Through the use of reason and logic, and with the more specialized tools provided by science and technology, human beings are likely to change themselves and their societies for the better. It is reasonable to expect that future societies will be more humane, more just, more enlightened, and more prosperous than they are now. Postmodernists deny this Enlightenment faith in science and technology as instruments of human progress. Indeed, many postmodernists hold that the misguided (or unguided) pursuit of scientific and technological knowledge led to the development of technologies for killing on a massive scale [And yet, more people are alive today than the totality of all people who ever lived before- SIGNY] in World War II. Some go so far as to say that science and technology—and even reason and logic—are inherently destructive and oppressive, because they have been used by evil people, especially during the 20th century, to destroy and oppress others.
The Postmodern disagreement with reason and logic as leading to a better world is perhaps a half-argument against Enlightenment. The Enlightenment viewed human rationality as the center of the universe around which all understanding orbited. However, Enlightenment philosophers never attempted to turn that rationality around to try to understand humans, societies, the presence of parasites and cancers in human economies, and the limitations of "rational logic" itself. I think that societies are complex organisms made of human individuals as cells, and understanding human societies is as possible as understanding biology. It's complex, and we are nowhere towards understanding the full scope of biology - and we never will be - but it's possible to gain a CLEARER understanding of what drives us.

We will know whether a school of thought is accurate or not by whether it can predict events.

Quote:

4. Reason and logic are universally valid—i.e., their laws are the same for, or apply equally to, any thinker and any domain of knowledge. For postmodernists, reason and logic too are merely conceptual constructs and are therefore valid only within the est

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Thursday, August 24, 2017 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I don't recall how I got there, but I stumbled on this little gem while bunny-trailing my way through a topic, and found it very interesting. I think that part of the disconnect that happens on the board is that some people treat everything as a matter of opinion, which is a feature of post-modern philosophy
Quote:

Postmodern philosophy is a philosophical direction which is critical of certain foundational assumptions of Western philosophy and especially of the 18th-century Enlightenment. It emphasizes the importance of power relationships, personalization and discourse in the "construction" of truth and world views. Postmodernists deny that an objective reality exists, and deny that there are objective moral values....

many postmodern claims are a deliberate repudiation of certain 18th-century Enlightenment values. A postmodernist might believe that there is no objective natural reality, and that logic and reason are mere conceptual constructs that are not universally valid. Two other characteristic anti-Enlightenment postmodern practices are a denial that human nature exists, and a (sometimes moderate) skepticism toward claims that science and technology will change society for the better. Postmodernists also believe there are no objective moral values. Postmodern writings often focus on deconstructing the role that power and ideology play in shaping discourse and belief. Postmodern philosophy shares ontological similarities with classical skeptical and relativistic belief systems, and shares political similarities with modern identity politics.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodern_philosophy

that just sounds like dressed-up excuses for avoiding critical thought, reason, pertinent questions.

And embracing weed.

Embracing emotion (irrational reaction) as displacement for reason (rational and critical thought.)

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Friday, August 25, 2017 12:06 AM

Nothing wrong with weed.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Wednesday, August 26, 2026 8:43 PM

Philosophical Struggle That Defined China - Hundred Schools of Thought

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME