When Buddhists Go Bad
POSTED BY: Niki2
UPDATED: Sunday, July 5, 2026 16:28
VIEWED: 3764
PAGE 1 of 3
Terrorist Buddhists: My world is truly going insane...and it grieves me:
Quote:
It's a faith famous for its pacifism and tolerance. But in several of Asia's Buddhist-majority nations, monks are inciting bigotry and violence--mostly against Muslims
The spectacle of faith makes for luminous photography. Buddhism, in particular, lends itself to the lens: those shaven heads and richly hued monastic robes; the swirls of incense; the pure expressions of devotees to a religion whose first precept is “do not kill.” But as photographer Adam Dean and I discovered when traveling through Burma and Thailand from May to June, Buddhism’s pacifist image is being challenged by a radical strain that marries spirituality with ethnic chauvinism. In Buddhist-majority Burma, where communal clashes have proliferated over the past year, scores of Muslims have been killed by Buddhist mobs, while in Thailand and Sri Lanka the fabric binding temple and state is being stitched ever tighter.
The godfather of radical Buddhism is a monk named Wirathu, a slight presence with an outsized message of hate. Adam followed Wirathu, who has taken the title of “Burmese bin Laden,” around Mandalay in central Burma, as he preached his loathing of the country’s Muslim minority to schoolchildren and housewives alike. In March, tensions detonated in the town of Meikhtila, where communal violence ended dozens of lives, mostly Muslim. Entire Muslim quarters were razed by Buddhists hordes. Even today, anxiety churns. One late afternoon as Adam walked near Wirathu’s monastic compound, a monk hurled a brick at him. Burgundy robes cannot camouflage inborn hostility.
In Southern Thailand, which was once united as a Muslim Malay sultanate, monks count on soldiers to shield them from harm. A separatist insurgency has claimed around 5,000 lives since 2004, and while more Muslims have died, it is Buddhists who feel particularly vulnerable as targets of shadowy militants. The Thai military now stations its troops in Buddhist temple compounds, further cleaving a pair of religions whose followers once shared each other’s feast days. One morning in mid-June, a bomb exploded in Kradoh, Pattani province, as Thai rangers patrolled a street where a peace and reconciliation meeting was taking place. Chanchote Phetpong, 28, who was clutching a bag of rose apples as he strolled, endured the brunt of the explosion; his orphaned fruit lay scattered in a pool of his blood.
At the nearby Yarang hospital, Adam photographed as teachers, mostly Buddhist, came to pay their respects to the dead ranger, who normally protected them as they walked to school each day. A Muslim nurse with a head covering quietly plucked shrapnel out of Chanchote’s face, cleaning him up for his funeral, while another tended to one of his wounded comrades. A clutch of Buddhist rangers looked on. The nurses’ veils felt like a reproach, a symbol of the divide between faiths in this nervous land. “They are scared of all of us,” whispered one Muslim hospital worker. “We used to have trust but that’s gone.” http://lightbox.time.com/2013/06/20/when-buddhists-go-bad-photographs-
by-adam-dean/#ixzz2X4145IPY]
More at http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2146000,00.html?pcd=h
p-magmod and http://world.time.com/2013/06/20/extremist-buddhist-monks-fight-oppres
sion-with-violence/, which asks "As the violence mounts, will Buddhists draw inspiration from their faith’s sutras of compassion and peace to counter religious chauvinism? Or will they succumb to the hate speech of radical monks like Burma’s Wirathu, who goads his followers to “rise up” against Islam? The world’s judgment awaits."
Wirathu, by the way, is lashing back at Time magazine after seeing his image splashed across the cover with the words “Face of Buddhist Terror.” He has called on Buddhists in Burma to unite against “a growing Muslim threat.” So it's
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
It's a photo essay, and I don't want to take the time to resize the photos, so here they are
with foreshortened captions:
Wirathu, the spiritual leader of the 969 Buddhist Nationalist movement, and his entourage 
A Wirathu supporter bows at his feet 
burnt-out vehicle and damaged buildings razed by Buddhists in ethnic violence in March
Villagers from Kyaw Min drive ahead of Wirathu's vehicle 
Burned trees and damaged buildings razed by Buddhists in ethnic violence in March
Thai Army soldier provides security as monks collect alms on morning rounds
Lieutenant talks to military trainers from Thai Army (left) and Buddhist volunteer defense militia (right)
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Buddhist monk Wirathu leads violent national campaign against Myanmar's Muslims
Ashin Wirathu was unapologetic when asked about his role at the center of a rising tide of Buddhist extremism that has crested in a wave of anti-Muslim violence resulting in the deaths of more than 200 people and displacement of some 150,000 from their homes in recent months.
“Muslims are like the African carp. They breed quickly and they are very violent and they eat their own kind. Even though they are minorities here, we are suffering under the burden they bring us,” Wirathu, 48, said .
“Because the Burmese people and the Buddhists are devoured every day, the national religion needs to be protected,” he said, announcing that he would push for a ban on interfaith marriage before the next parliamentary session and vowing to continue the so-called “969” campaign that calls for Buddhists to only do business with other Buddhists and exclude Muslims who have a strong tradition as merchants in Myanmar.
Myanmar, also known as Burma, is made of eight major ethnic groups, but 90 percent of the population is Buddhist.
Wirathu’s sermons play on the fear among some Buddhists in certain parts of Myanmar of a rising Muslim population that some feel is threatening the majority Buddhist religion and its traditions. Wirathu and others have spurred a movement known as “969,” which calls for Buddhists to band together to defend their faith and for Buddhists to do business only with other Buddhists. The numerology of the “969” movement refers to the virtues of the Buddha, the practices of the faith and the community. The distinctive “969” stickers are ubiquitous on shops, motorcycles and car windows.
Wirathu has also pushed a ban against interfaith marriage, claiming that the Buddhist majority is diluted by such marriages and reeling off one anecdote after another of forced conversions of Buddhist women to Islam. Many critics here and abroad say Wirathu’s sermons are racist rants against Muslims who he has likened to “mad dogs” and “cannibals” and, in perhaps a more charitable and consistent reference, as simply “troublemakers.”
But Wirathu’s movement is gaining a wider and wider following.
He heads the Ma Soeyein monastery attended by some 2,500 monks, has an active Facebook page and leads speaking tours that attract thousands of followers. Wirathu is also gathering signatures for a petition to introduce the interfaith marriage legislation which he has titled, “Safeguarding the National Identity.”
“The people are requesting that we put forward the ‘Safeguarding the National Identity’ law,” he said, adding, “I am committed to working on this law until it is passed.”
This proposed law, if it does come to a vote, would likely put pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, who was elected to parliament two years ago, and those who support her efforts in a difficult position.
Political observers say it will put them between their hopes to unify the many different ethnic groups that have been fighting a series of open conflicts with the previous military regime and a broad populist streak among the majority ethnic Burmans who are coalescing around this new brand of Buddhist nationalism.
The proposed ban on interfaith marriage is not new in Burma, and it has been implemented in other countries in the region, including Singapore. It is similar to a popular idea that first emerged in the 1930s and called for a strong nationalist movement. And this is not the first time that Buddhist monks have used their authority to influence the history of Myanmar. They have always been part of major political movements.
Wirathu himself is no stranger to activism; he was arrested in 2003 for political incitement and served seven years in prison before he was reportedly released as part of a government amnesty program. Buddhist monks were also at the head of the 2007 "Saffron Revolution,” in which monks took to the streets in large numbers to protest the rising p
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
In the end, only the individuals believers can be peaceful, in any religion, but the religion itself is another story. The institutions and leadership invariably are about authority, money, influence, power-struggles, intolerance, and ultimately conflict.
It was a member of the warrior caste of India who introduced Buddhism to China. And when push comes to shove, every power will react, violently, to further their agenda/self-interests or protect themselves, no matter if it is under the aspice of legitimate government, or that of spirituality.
I don't mind regular average citizen Buddhists, but then I hear what the Dalai Lama of Tibet has to say about homosexuality, and it's not for me. I understand people needing religion, and that it can bring comfort. But I don't like any religion, even the "peaceful" ones.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
While Buddhism isn't strictly a religion, in fact not SUPPOSED to be practiced as one in many interpretations, I do agree with you about religions, and about Buddhism when it is "used" as a religion, as in the situation in this thread.
I don't know what you're referring to regarding the Dali Lama and homosexuality. As far as I've ever known, he doesn't condemn anyone or support condemning anyone, whatever his personal opinion may be. What I find is Quote:
In his discussions of the traditional Buddhist view on appropriate sexual behavior, he explains the concept of "right organ in the right object at the right time," which historically has been interpreted as indicating that oral, manual and anal sex (both homosexual and heterosexual) are not appropriate in Buddhism or for Buddhists, yet he also says that in modern times all common, consensual sexual practices that do not cause harm to others are ethically acceptable and that society should not discriminate against gays and lesbians and should accept and respect them from a secular point of view.[72] In a 1994 interview with OUT Magazine, the Dalai Lama clarified his personal opinion on the matter by saying, "If someone comes to me and asks whether homosexuality is okay or not, I will ask 'What is your companion's opinion?'. If you both agree, then I think I would say, 'If two males or two females voluntarily agree to have mutual satisfaction without further implication of harming others, then it is okay.'"
In his 1996 book Beyond Dogma, he described a traditional Buddhist definition of an appropriate sexual act as follows: "A sexual act is deemed proper when the couples use the organs intended for sexual intercourse and nothing else... Homosexuality, whether it is between men or between women, is not improper in itself. What is improper is the use of organs already defined as inappropriate for sexual contact."[74] He elaborated in 1997, explaining that the basis of that teaching was unknown to him. He also conveyed his own "willingness to consider the possibility that some of the teachings may be specific to a particular cultural and historic context".
That from Wikipedia. I'm not sure you can get much more accepting of homosexuality unless you ARE homosexual or bisexual, can you?
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
While Buddhism isn't strictly a religion, in fact not SUPPOSED to be practiced as one in many interpretations, I do agree with you about religions, and about Buddhism when it is "used" as a religion, as in the situation in this thread.
Yes. That's what I meant.
Quote:
That from Wikipedia. I'm not sure you can get much more accepting of homosexuality unless you ARE homosexual or bisexual, can you?
Hmmmm. Either he walked his official opinion back, or the original interview was poorly translated. However, whenever someone says something like that, it's hard to trust them again because there's always that ambiguity about whether it was translation versus what they really think.
In that case, I feel about the Dalai Lama the same way I feel about the new pope. They seem like okay people, except for some things I might disagree with them on, but they might have other things going on (Tibet versus China, power struggles in the Catholic church), and I'm not sure I trust the organization around them.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Those intolerant sob's!
Do I really have to say it?
Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen
Resident USA Freedom Fundie
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Why would you "have to" say the obvious? Do you have some point to make, or are you just trolling?
Byte, I trust nobody who represents power in a religion, all too often that power is used negatively. I have positive feelings about the new Pope, who shows some indication of reflecting what Christianity is supposedly really about, and the Dali Lama I trust insofar as I KNOW he will NEVER use his power to encourage others to do ill. That is a simple fact. He will express opinions, but everyone's entitled to theirs in my opinion, it's when they start preaching to others that I want nothing to do with them. And what this monk is doing is directly opposed to everything Buddhism is about, which is why he horrifies me.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
" Do you have some point to make, or are you just trolling?"
Oh, let me answer that for him. Just trolling. In fact, trolling is ALL he does. That makes replying to him completely unnecessary.
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Even the peace loving Buddhists are being driven to violence, all thanks to who ?
Radical , unchecked extremist Muslims.
How is that 'trolling', when I'm stating the obvious. Had *I* started this thread, I'd be accused of bigotry, racism, and who the hell knows what else.
But I didn't. So all you can say is ' TROLL! ', and run away.
That figures.
Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen
Resident USA Freedom Fundie
" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME