Other Science Fiction Series

Apollo 18: DVD Extras

POSTED BY: piratenews
UPDATED: Monday, January 9, 2012 03:52
VIEWED: 5776
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, December 30, 2011 10:39 AM



In December, 1974, the crew of the previously-cancelled Apollo 18 mission is informed that the mission is a go, though it has now been deemed a top secret Department of Defense mission. Commander Nathan Walker, Lieutenant Colonel John Grey and Captain Benjamin Anderson are launched towards the Moon to place detectors to alert the United States of any impending ICBM attacks from the USSR.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_18_(film)

Are we looking in the wrong place for ET? Scientists suggest 'footprints' on moon could be best place to look for alien life
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2079329/Scientists-sugg
est-footprints-moon-best-place-look-alien-life.html


NASA agents raid Denny's in undercover sting after woman, 74, tries to sell moon rock that was gift from Neil Armstrong.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2052819/NASA-raids-Dennys-Joan
n-Davis-74-tries-sell-Neil-Armstrong-moon-dust.html


Missing NASA Apollo videotapes found at... McDonalds
http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=35091&m=642567

Apollo 18 and Soyuz 19 Launched: July 15, 1975
Meeting in Space: July 17, 1975
http://history.nasa.gov/apollo/soyuz.html



NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, January 7, 2012 10:21 AM

Apollo 18 viewer says, "My vagina is out":



Quote:

NASA reaches its outer limit

The agency, seeing films and TV with space themes as a way to keep public interest in its programs, readily consults on Hollywood projects. But it has pulled back from 'Apollo 18.'

A cracked cosmonaut helmet, footsteps in the moon dust, a mysterious flash of light outside a spaceship window — these are some of the images the Weinstein Co. has released from "Apollo 18," a documentary-style sci-fi thriller opening Friday that the studio is marketing as a movie culled from "found footage" from a U.S. space mission.

"In 1972, the United States sent two astronauts on a secret mission to the moon," the trailer says. "Despite decades of denial by NASA and the Department of Defense, classified footage of the mission was leaked to the media."

To recap: Evidence of a vast, 40-year government conspiracy is allegedly about to be exposed by the movie studio that brought you "Piranha 3D" and "Scream 4."

A number of this summer's openly fictional films — Michael Bay's alien robot sequel "Transformers: Dark of the Moon," Terrence Malick's celestial drama "The Tree of Life," the speculative sci-fi indie "Another Earth" — have wrestled with galactic themes and relied on NASA scientists, materials and imagery. Last year, in fact, the U.S. space agency collaborated on nearly 100 documentaries, 35 TV shows and 16 feature films.

But after initially touting "Apollo 18" as one of its upcoming fiction film collaborations, NASA — which, for the record, says the last manned mission to the moon was Apollo 17 in 1972 — has begun to back away from the movie.

"Apollo 18 is not a documentary," said Bert Ulrich, NASA's liaison for multimedia, film and television collaborations. "The film is a work of fiction, and we always knew that. We were minimally involved with this picture. We never even saw a rough cut. The idea of portraying the Apollo 18 mission as authentic is simply a marketing ploy. Perhaps a bit of a 'Blair Witch Project' strategy to generate hype."

With the U.S. space agency at a crossroads — it retired its space shuttle program in July, it's relying on Russian rockets to ferry its astronauts to the International Space Station, and it's struggling to find funding and political support for its next mission of sending astronauts to an asteroid in about 15 years — NASA realizes that keeping the public interested in the extraterrestrial is critical to its future.

There was a time when NASA's actual missions — not the "Blair Witch" versions of them — were enough. But without another high-profile NASA project on the runway, working with Hollywood is key.

"It's a wonderful way to reach the public through these huge media means like feature films and television shows, and it can inspire people in an interesting way, and it also can instruct people about what space exploration is all about," Ulrich said.

Sometimes, as with "Apollo 18," attempts at collaboration break down. Another film that the agency refused to work on was the 2000 Warner Bros. bomb "The Red Planet," about making Mars safe for human colonization.

"The science was just so off the wall that eventually we felt, 'You guys go ahead and make your movie.' If there's something that's going to be so misleading to the public that we don't want to participate, then we'll say no," said Ulrich. "The big thing is, we want to make sure we're not misleading the public completely. So if all of a sudden there's a change in what was shot or a change in the storyboard, they're supposed to inform us."

But the boundaries are often expansive. Consider "Transformers: Dark of the Moon," which Paramount Pictures rereleased in Imax theaters on Aug. 26. It proposes an alternative reason for the 1960s space race — that it was triggered by the discovery of an alien spaceship that had crashed on the moon.

Last October, NASA allowed director Michael Bay to film key scenes on one of its shuttle launch pads at Florida's Kennedy Space Center,

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Saturday, January 7, 2012 2:51 PM

This story has been done TOO MANY times, there's a reason it taked in theaters. I'll wait for it to come to cable, and even then I'll tilt back a few drinks to watch it.

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, January 9, 2012 1:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by whozit:
This story has been done TOO MANY times, there's a reason it taked in theaters. I'll wait for it to come to cable, and even then I'll tilt back a few drinks to watch it.



Actually it made a massive profit of over 500%. Joss would kill any character for that much profit margin.

This movie was practically made by NASA, so there was zero deviation from the "real" Apollo script. Here's my review on Amazon:

Quote:

Great script, great acting, great lighting, great sound, great props, great directing, great editing, great budgeting, great marketing. Excellent movie all around, but the Ritalin/caffeine/tobacco/pacifier addicts demand more explosions and "giant moonster rabbit" slashers to avoid attention deficit.

"Apollo 18" used a moon stage in an old paper recycling factory with "hundreds of truckloads" of lunar simulant, and "hanging mural" backgrounds or CGI backgrounds by a Russian animation company. The rover was custom made in Canada. LEM was the same prop used in the movie "Apollo 13". The steampunk Russian LK lander was built on site in Canada. Interior LEM video was shot with a $200 GoPro SD camera with extra blurring to simulate NASA's $50-million hi-res Westinghouse cams (also with lots of extra blurring added on purpose).

NASA's "advisor" to "Apollo 18", Gerry Griffin, a/k/a "NASA's most important asset" and former Director of the NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center in Houston, Deputy Director of the John F. Kennedy Space Center in Florida, and Flight director during the real Apollo 13, used his government welfare dole to extort the movie from straying too far into conspiracy, revealing too many secrets, or failing to perpetrate official myths. For example, Griffen showed them how to fake lunar gravity using wires and a harness -- removed by CGI in post production -- no radio delay from Earth to moon, no stars in space, and no shots of rocket exhaust from the LEM, just like the real Apollo. Despite the writer's and director's commentary with obligatory suckup to NASA, "Apollo 18" successfully proves how easy it was for NASA to fake a moon landing on a $5-million budget...and how stoopid NASA thinks sheeple are:

MOVIESONLINE.CA: "The True Story The Apollo 18 Movie Was Based On. The Apollo 18, 19 and 20 flights were cancelled by NASA and never happened. To sum up NASA's stance is Apollo 18 / 19 and 20 did not happen.

SPACE.COM: "'Apollo 18' Offers Conspiracy Theory, to NASA's Surprise. The premise does begin in fact. NASA originally planned an Apollo 18 mission to the moon (along with Apollo 19 and 20), but those flights were canceled in 1970 due to budgetary constraints. The studio has been pushing the "reality" aspect of the film, going so far as to offer up a "famous scientist and researcher of UFO phenomena," Stanton Friedman, for interviews. 'People ask why was there no Apollo 18 mission,' Friedman said in press materials. 'I ask, what happened to Apollo 18 and Apollo 19? They were both paid for and astronauts were trained. What happened to these missions?' Friedman hasn't been allowed to view the film yet, according to the Los Angeles Times, but said he's open to the possibility that the Apollo 18 mission did occur and that NASA's been covering it up. NASA provided the producers with public domain footage from the actual moon missions and even allowed them to use its official "meatball" logo on the actors' spacesuits. But the space agency said it had no formal involvement in the film. Initially, NASA officials didn't realize the moviemakers planned to portray the story as a real-life exposé. 'We were always under the impression it was fictional -- it was basically never touted as anything but fictional, said Bert Ulrich, NASA's liaison for multimedia, film and television collaborations. 'Apollo 18' isn't the first suggestion that America's manned moon missions did not go as planned. Ever since the first lunar landing in 1969, some have insisted the moon achievement was a hoax. 'There are a handful of stories that are cyclical, and among t

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Monday, January 9, 2012 3:52 AM

PN! You have earned this!



The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME