Nazis Among Us
POSTED BY: dreamtrove
UPDATED: Wednesday, July 24, 2024 14:54
VIEWED: 2059
PAGE 1 of 3
Reading through this cancer research I was struck by an appalling possibility:
First, I looked at a series of reactions, and then thought, but that cant be right, that would kill the patient. So I went through it again, and again. And then I thought, any sane patient under such a plan would look at that and say "My doctor wouldn't do that to me, would he?"
No, of course not. Not intentionally that is. But what if he didn't know that was what he was doing? What if higher agencies had told him that the condition was incurable, and that this was the best chance. He'd have to try, it would be the only human thing to do.
Why would anyone do such a thing? Economics and Eugenics. The sick cost money, and use resources, while not contributing to a healthy gene pool. He'll, they might even be a part of an ethnic group targeted for extermination.
So, I dig into where the suggestions come from. The FDA, run by big pharm, but before that, the recommendations come from the WHO. The WHO is a pretty clear heir to the eugenics movement, and before I say that the UN is a successor state to Nazi Germany, or that the US is, I have to take a stab at who the Nazis were.
Nazi Germany is a creation of foreign financial interests, merged with a national isolationists revolution trying to flee those very same influences in the wiemar republic. I don't think thats very radical, its probably obvious to everyone here.
The more curious thing I've noticed is the fairly radical shift in policy in Germany in 1938. I figure there was some change of sub-leadership, in the advisory corps, as happens sometimes here, particularly starting around 1974. This change in Germany in 1938 transforms the Jewish expulsion into the holocaust, Germany into a world war and an alliance with Japan. It also changes the foreign policy focus in Europe from western european domination through revolution for the fascists to eastern European domination through wholesale slaughter.
Now it would be easy to draw the kind of conspiracy John likes to to say Hitler was a Rothschild, and Jewish, by his own one grandparent definition, but I don't think this is pertinent. I'm going to make the radical suggestion that Nazi Germany was the creation of British and american eugenicists. An experiment, as it were. Furthermore, that Germany was then used for the eugenicists primary goal of the time, to try to exterminate the Slavic race. It fits the pattern of activity very well, and explains their loss of interest in progress or western Europe, and their increasingly violent and genocidal tactics.
If this is the case its entirely possible that my ancestors main sin for the eugenicist Nazi army was not that they were Jewish, but that they were Slavs. Little effort was made to irradiate the western Jewry, or to depopulate Europe of non-Germans, and almost no effort was made against the US and UK outside or random bombings, see Orwell...
So, the more radical suggestion that the international interests, whose choice of religion was really immaterial, were never anchored in Germany to begin with, and that it was or became a puppet state by the same people who run our society today. Nothing has essentially changed, and nothing was particularly gained by the defeat of Germany from the point of view of the common man, but a great deal was gained from the crisis of war created by TPTB which cowed the world into accepting radical changes in the was the world was run.
Now we are coming to the point that TPTB frequently find themselves in which is that they are no longer satisfied with the amount of power they gained then, and a new generation of useless silver spoon elitists need to prove themselves as dominators of the globe.
Meanwhile, they're still playing god with the little people, only they've become such puppet masters that their agents of action are no longer aware of the masters they serve. Today's elitists believe that capitalism is a force of evolution, and that the poor are poor because they are inferior. This is just a cover rationalization for their desi
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Upon awakening it seems like less of a revelation, but contains a couple other conspiracies the origin of which I do not know
One is control commodities. I'm certain the fracking is about intentionally poisoning the water more than it is about the extraction of natural gas, and the nat gas companies have probably been convinced by the blue gold crowd that adding these chemicals will help them in various ways, and they are the dupes in this case.
Nat gas is just a branch of a control commodity: oil. Much of WWII was about oil, which Britain saw as its means of controlling Europe. Before that I don't see control commodities, just useless habitual commodities like cotton and tobacco originating from the land owning aristocracy I would guess. Land generating revenue. Theres obviously way more land that is farmed than is need to be in order to feed the worlds population, even today, let alone back in the 18th c. Modern farming methods have done very little to increase yield, only decrease the labor required.
Since then we've seen a couple serious control commodities sprout up, like medicine. Both legal and illicit drugs are used this way. There's another major one that's eluding me at the moment.
Articifical value commodities like gold are out fo vogue with TPTB right now, but still big in Africa, hence the diamond wars. I wouldn't be too surprised if those diamonds were actually be manufactured by GE and sold to an ignorant populous, but hey, we accept federal reserve notes as payment, so go figure.
I suppose ultimately they will attack food as a control commodity, its worth figuring out who they are. I suspect the eugenicists, because this is being used as a form of genocidal war, destroying the land under the target population. Haiti is really an excellent model for the way in which the NWO attacks the undesirables.
I also had another thought about nazis. Many of their casualties were eastern european conscripts, as were many of the Russian casualties. This looks like a conspiracy but might just be two different groups with the same agenda, kill the locals and import your own population.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Hello,
It's a bit early for me, so I may have lost a train of thought.
Are you positing that cancer treatment is designed to kill the patient?
--Anthony
Assured by friends that the signal-to-noise ratio has improved on this forum, I have disabled web filtering.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
DT, tell me if this is what you're thinking... Following the logic of cancer treatments, which seem designed to be terminal altho disguised as a "Hail Mary" pass, you detect a pattern of TPTB working towards eugenics.
If I may rearrange a bit...
Quote:It is well known that American banking, engineering, and manufacturing interests... the Bush family, for example... collaborated with the Nazis. I think there is more than being Slavic which was at stake. American and British financial interests had always seen the Russian revolution as the critical threat to their way of life... certainly more of a threat than the Nazis, who were believers in the hand-in-glove cooperation between established financial interests and the state.
So, the more radical suggestion that the international interests, whose choice of religion was really immaterial, were never anchored in Germany to begin with, and that it was or became a puppet state by the same people who run our society today...[I noticed a] fairly radical shift in policy in Germany in 1938... This change in Germany in 1938 transforms the Jewish expulsion into the holocaust, Germany into a world war and an alliance with Japan. It also changes the foreign policy focus in Europe from western european domination through revolution for the fascists to eastern European domination through wholesale slaughter.
Nothing embodied the Red Menace like the unwashed Slavs, who were dangerous economic enemies as well as visually different. This change in policy may have come about from a foreign nudge, in the belief that the Germans could be used to wipe out the threat from the east, leaving Britain and the USA the victors by default.
Quote:Rappy believes this, and so does everyone who clings to "capitalism".
Nothing has essentially changed, and nothing was particularly gained by the defeat of Germany from the point of view of the common man, but a great deal was gained from the crisis of war created by TPTB which cowed the world into accepting radical changes in the wa(y) the world was run.
Now we are coming to the point that TPTB frequently find themselves in which is that they are no longer satisfied with the amount of power they gained then, and a new generation of useless silver spoon elitists need to prove themselves as dominators of the globe. Meanwhile, they're still playing god with the little people, only they've become such puppet masters that their agents of action are no longer aware of the masters they serve. Today's elitists believe that capitalism is a force of evolution, and that the poor are poor because they are inferior.... Even on an individual level, I cannot get any of those that I know to admit that they were dealt an unfair advantage no matter how free thinking they are. Given such a self denial, it would be easy to fall into the trap of believing the fallacy of social mobility just as it is of believing in democracy, justice, absolution, salvation or other unsupported premises commonly believed.
I think what came to you is a deep-seated emotional understanding of the paradigm of the wealthy. How little the lives of "lesser beings" mean. How elitists can condemn millions to misery and a well-deserved death.
I came across a business magazine once. There was an ad in it, placed by the nation of Ireland, if you can believe it. It was to seduce businesses to locate there, and what it said was:
Our population is well-educated. We are politically stable. Our currency is undervalued. And our people are desperate for work. You can make a lot of money here.
That is how they think of the world.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Oh BTW DT- did you look into nanoparticle research being done using the same ventilation system? It could even be a nearby pharmaceutical company working with nanoparticle metal oxides (used in sunscreen and makeup).
Nanoparticles will literally creep up the odor nerves and wind up in the brain. That is one way in which a cancer-producing agent can be brain-specific. Like I said before, sounds like science fiction, but it isn't.
www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/newscience/nanoparticles-damage-br
ain-cells/
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:I'm not answering for DT.
Originally posted by AnthonyT:
Are you positing that cancer treatment is designed to kill the patient?
But *my* answer is yes.
And the reason I say that is because they have chosen the most harmful treatments available to sanction as the only valid treatments, while either outlawing or otherwise excluding more gentle treatments.
Can't Take (my gorram) Sky
------
Everything I say is just my opinion, not fact.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
More gentle treatments that don't actually work, you mean.
Cancer treatments are harsh, but they improve your survival rate, not decrease it.
If a cancer is untreatable, then doctors generally don't treat it or they should give you a realistic option.
People have somehow linked chemo and death, but the sad fact is that despite treatments, people still die from cancer, but it's not the chemo that kills them. Some people continue to make that link.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Sig,
You need to check out order out of attacking the new world order, whoever originally posted the link, if you can, repost here, it's was bytemite I think
The Russian revolution was state capitalism, and funded by the Rothschild bank, its not exactly an outside element, but it got out of their control, and so yes, they turned against it, and yes, they were more worried about this than about Germany.
But the plan to exterminate the Slavs definitely precedes this. I'm sure you're right that they thought that they could use Germany to destroy Russia, or some of them did, but it's important to remember that the powers that be are not a monolithic entity. Many NWO types deliberately sold eastern Europe to Russia. My own homeland of .cz being a primary example.
ETA: I think this is unfair to Rap. He's a reasonable individual with whom you happen to disagree. I disagree with him sometimes as well, but whenever I get angry, I find I regret it later. Everyone here at FFF is essentially a political ally. If it were not so, our band of the political spectrum would be rather small. I don't really have major problems with anyone here, and I humbly suggest that for people who do, that you just take a moment to check comment boards on some of the other sites, CNN, FOX, MSNBC, etc. I think you'll find auraptor refreshingly liberal by comparison.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Sorry guys if this comes through in several posts. Ipad forgets when I itch pages, so I an only do one at a time.
Sig
Yes i did, its possible, CFCs are the major threat, or something radioactive, but high level. Beta radiation, not radon.
At the moment I'm not investigating causes, cures are taking up all my time. The resulting cancer has little to do with its cause. Pathogenesis is determined by cell type, not mutagen, so its not useful information for the case, so it's been bumped down on the priority listless. My advice to everyone is stay away from unnatural things. ESP. Construction done in the 1950s or later.
Watch the water supply.
Byte
We will need a canary for this one. Something that will not grow in water contain petrochemicals and CFCs.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Anthony
The disconnect was mine not yours, it wS a pretty discombobulated post.
Also, a forewarning, I'm finding lots of contradictory information, so my reports may change.
Yes. I'm considering it as a possibility. It does serve two purposes of the powers that be.
My analysis of the treatments is based on a pretty solid background in the field. Looking at who llayed it, and what they turned down, I'm baffled if their intention was to cure the disease,
I don't mean that anyone in medicine is in on this, just that someone up top, like whoever bush appointed to head the FDA, and the WHO is always suspect.
Maybe it's just bad bureaucracy, but why you wouldn't okay to try cure with 1% fatality rate to treat a disease with a 99% fatality rate, it just boggles.
Also, this would not be the first time that such a claim was made, many people commented that the standard AIDS regimen kills the patient, where alternatives which were not passed were far more promising.
Another thing that enters into this is pure corruption. The company that makes drug A has connections, and drug B's owner does not, so it doesn't matter whY the chances are
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME