The Children of Gaza
POSTED BY: piratenews
UPDATED: Thursday, October 16, 2025 14:26
VIEWED: 2413
PAGE 1 of 2
Channel 4 Dispatches: The Children Of Gaza (2010)
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2010/03/ch4-dispatches-child
ren-of-gaza-2010.html
http://www.megavideo.com/?v=TGQFCGXH
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Might be time for the terrorists to stop hiding behind the children when launching rockets at civilian settlements?
Hell of a lesson to be taught.
Summer Glau can simply walk into Mordor
Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Might be time for the terrorists to stop hiding behind the children when launching rockets at civilian settlements?
Isreal should do two things. One, announce a unilateral end to all attacks on Palestine lands. Something like, starting Monday, unilateral cease fire and announce that no attack will resume until the "count of three" and that "peace is now Palestine's option". Remind the world that there are two avenues to peace. The first being the rode of nonviolent negotiation and compromise, the other being the the complete and total destruction of the other side. Again, make the choice Palestine's.
When the first rocket attack comes, they go to the UN and say "One".
Second, "Two".
Third, complete unrestrained bombing of all military targets in Palestine regardless of civilian casualties. A bombing campaign unmatched since the end of World War 2, followed by the total occupation of Palestine, followed by buses removing and depositing every Palestinian person beyond Isreal's new borders.
H
"Hero. I have come to respect you." "I am forced to agree with Hero here."- Chrisisall, 2009.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Which "terrorists" would that be, I wonder? No, wait, he must mean the Palestinians, 'cuz the actions of the Israeli army are more like individual "atrocities" than "terrorism".
If it were just civilians being killed--or children--because of bombs, that would be one thing. But it's individual and mass SLAUGHTER of children and adults--for that there is no excuse.Quote:
http://irish4palestine.blogspot.com/2009/02/israeli-army-admits-to-pol
Israel targets children and they are guilty of War Crimes. In fact, they have already admitted this
icy-of.html Israeli army has been forced to open an investigation into the conduct of its troops in Gaza after damning testimony from its own front line soldiers revealed the killing of civilians and rules of engagement so lax that one combatant said that they amounted on occasion to “cold-blooded murder”.
The revelations, compiled by the head of an Israel military academy who declared that he was “shocked” at the findings, come as international rights groups are calling for independent inquiries into the conduct of both sides in the three-week Israeli offensive against Palestinian Islamists.
The soldiers’ testimonies include accounts of an unarmed old woman being shot at a distance of 100 yards, a woman and her two children being killed after Israeli soldiers ordered them from their house into the line of fire of a sniper and soldiers clearing houses by shooting anyone they encountered on sight.
http://cryptogon.com/?p=7605
We've been through all this before time and time again; it's all over the internet and news if one cares to look. It's not about hiding behind children, it's about the Israeli Army having freedom to shoot whoever it feels like. Period.
"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Hero:Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Might be time for the terrorists to stop hiding behind the children when launching rockets at civilian settlements?
Isreal should do two things. One, announce a unilateral end to all attacks on Palestine lands. Something like, starting Monday, unilateral cease fire and announce that no attack will resume until the "count of three" and that "peace is now Palestine's option". Remind the world that there are two avenues to peace. The first being the rode of nonviolent negotiation and compromise, the other being the the complete and total destruction of the other side. Again, make the choice Palestine's.
When the first rocket attack comes, they go to the UN and say "One".
Second, "Two".
Third, complete unrestrained bombing of all military targets in Palestine regardless of civilian casualties. A bombing campaign unmatched since the end of World War 2, followed by the total occupation of Palestine, followed by buses removing and depositing every Palestinian person beyond Isreal's new borders.
H
"Hero. I have come to respect you." "I am forced to agree with Hero here."- Chrisisall, 2009.
Why not just the total eradication of the Palestinians as a people? Isn't that what the Nazis were trying to do with the Jews? Seems we were kind of a little bit against that at the time...
"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Why not just the total eradication of the Palestinians as a people? Isn't that what the Nazis were trying to do with the Jews? Seems we were kind of a little bit against that at the time...
Actually I was thinking more along the lines of 'Total War' rather then genocide.
And my solution eliminates the historical context.
In my scenario Isreal unilaterally stops fighting giving use a means foreward for the peace process. If the Palestinians decide to pursue a military course, then they reap what they sow.
The point is that of the two sides, Isreal can stop fighting and make a peaceful solution, the Palestinians cannot do that, therefore Isreal has the right to defend itself and end this conflict once and for all.
H
"Hero. I have come to respect you." "I am forced to agree with Hero here."- Chrisisall, 2009.
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Niki2 wrote:
Monday, March 22, 2010 05:44
Which "terrorists" would that be, I wonder? No, wait, he must mean the Palestinians, 'cuz the actions of the Israeli army are more like individual "atrocities" than "terrorism".
If it were just civilians being killed--or children--because of bombs, that would be one thing. But it's individual and mass SLAUGHTER of children and adults--for that there is no excuse.
Who is it who said -
" We love death more than you love life "
Hmmm?
I'll give ya a hint... 5 letter word, starts with "H", ends in "S"...
I'm thinkin' it's well past time for some to rethink that barbaric, mindless policy.
Agree ? Yes or No.
Summer Glau can simply walk into Mordor
Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Hero:Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Why not just the total eradication of the Palestinians as a people? Isn't that what the Nazis were trying to do with the Jews? Seems we were kind of a little bit against that at the time...
Actually I was thinking more along the lines of 'Total War' rather then genocide.
And my solution eliminates the historical context.
In my scenario Isreal unilaterally stops fighting giving use a means foreward for the peace process. If the Palestinians decide to pursue a military course, then they reap what they sow.
The point is that of the two sides, Isreal can stop fighting and make a peaceful solution, the Palestinians cannot do that, therefore Isreal has the right to defend itself and end this conflict once and for all.
H
"Hero. I have come to respect you." "I am forced to agree with Hero here."- Chrisisall, 2009.
In that context, there MIGHT be something to it. I've long advocated the Palestinians unilaterally disarming and simply refusing to fight, refusing to pick up weapons, refusing to defend themselves, because what would Israel's reaction be? Could they carry out such a massacre on CLEARLY unarmed civilians who had announced well in advance that they wouldn't fight back? Could they do it with the world watching? And if so, what does that tell us about the Israeli government and its policies?
Not that I think either side would do it, but it seems like the one thing that HASN'T been tried. Well, that or nukes. Let's call those Plan B. I think Plan A has the potential for less of a body count.
"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Who is it who said -
" We love death more than you love life "
Was it Donald Rumsfeld? George Dubya Bush? Dick Cheney? They do seem to love them some death, so long as they're the ones giving the orders. They've never been big on being the boots-on-the-ground type of guys.
"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions
NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:Quote:
Who is it who said -
" We love death more than you love life "
Was it Donald Rumsfeld? George Dubya Bush? Dick Cheney? They do seem to love them some death, so long as they're the ones giving the orders. They've never been big on being the boots-on-the-ground type of guys.
No, it was HAMAS, dumbass. But keep shoving your head into the dark, narrow spaces and avoiding the issues of the day. It suits you.
Summer Glau can simply walk into Mordor
Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."
NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | PERMALINK | TOP | HOME