FIREFLYFANS.NET Central

Giant signatures.

POSTED BY: leadb
UPDATED: Sunday, October 28, 2007 16:06
VIEWED: 3739
PAGE 1 of 1

Sunday, October 28, 2007 1:40 PM

I've noticed disturbing trend to folks packing huge signatures lately. I don't suppose there's any reasonable way to 'confine' a signature to fit in a box no more than 600 pixels wide, and 400 pixels deep? Or some other 'sanity check' size?

====
Consider $5/year to support FFF: http://s1.amazon.com/exec/varzea/pay/T39WWCGS4JYCV4

NOTIFY: N  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, October 28, 2007 3:27 PM

I doubt it. Whenever someone mentions how much space or time the large files use, they get very definsive. Good luck talking sense into them.

I hope SU will have file size limits.

---
Sometimes I lie awake at night, and I ask, "Where have I gone wrong?" Then a voice says to me, "This is going to take more than one night."
-- Charlie Brown

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME

Sunday, October 28, 2007 4:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by leadb:
I've noticed disturbing trend to folks packing huge signatures lately. I don't suppose there's any reasonable way to 'confine' a signature to fit in a box no more than 600 pixels wide, and 400 pixels deep? Or some other 'sanity check' size?



Most other places I find signature creep to be fairly annoying so I certainly see where you are coming from but I find hear it's not so bad. And since I otherwise like this forum the way it is I don't think it's worth raising a stink.

David

'Geeks can't admit that anything worthwhile was invented before 1981. Soon, "making cocoa" will be called "milk hacking."' - Lore Sjoberg

NOTIFY: Y  | REPLY  | REPLY WITH QUOTE  | PERMALINK  | TOP  | HOME