SHINY

Wednesday, 16 February 2005 02:31

Shiny!!! :D

ANONYMOUS

Wednesday, 16 February 2005 03:47

february 21? today is february 15

ANONYMOUS

Wednesday, 16 February 2005 14:27

Magazines dates are the 'pull date'. That is when the Newsstand is supposed to pull them to make room for the next issue.

RADEGUND

Wednesday, 16 February 2005 14:30

>>february 21? today is february 15<<

It's common for magazines to be dated this way. I got the magazine on the 15th but the date on the cover is the 21st.

COSMICFUGITIVE

Wednesday, 16 February 2005 14:53

That is too damn shiny!

AURAPTOR

Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:11

OMG! *sniff* It's beautiful!

ANONYMOUS

Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:28

Very lovely but in true comic book fashion they over exagerate the woman's endowment. Gina Torres is a fine lookin' woman to be sure but she is not in any way buxom. She is lean and muscular she doesn't even have the usual black/latina women's birthright of "junk in the trunk". Still ... I would buy this poster sized in a New York minute.

AURAPTOR

Thursday, 17 February 2005 05:22

Gina is buxom enough for my likes. She's not Jessic Rabbit, but then, who is ? ( sorry ) I just wanted to add that when I heard there was going to be an animated version of Firefly, I was thinking ( Riddick, Animatrix ) But these works have a grittier, Norman Rockwell (?) feel to 'em. Or something. Cool, but not what I expected.

CHANNAIN

Thursday, 17 February 2005 21:52

They call that Dynamic Anatomy, I believe. There's a book to show you how to do that.

I don't think it's so much that she's been more heavily endowed, I think it's more that they "Barbie-fied" her waist. Gina's slender, but not THAT slender.

Norman Rockwell is a good comparison, AURaptor. I need to track down this issue, find out who did the illustration. These can only be concept character drawings. Ain't no way true annimation looks like that. Ever.